Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Su Terry's avatar

In a nutshell, I would ascribe the USA- diversity-in-the-arts problem as a too- many-bureaucrats-with- their-hand-in-the-pot problem.

Expand full comment
Erik Heddergott's avatar

Founding of Art through the State, the County and the Municipality is much more common and much more formalized but also much more transparent in Europe.

And believe it or not

there are even Grants to Art and Music from America.

The Reason why many US American Jazz Musicians can make a living is that they can play in Japan, or the „French“ Circuit, the „German“ Circuit or the „Scandinavian“ Circuit.

Not only Clubs or Festivals but often a Stand Alone Concert gets funded by one, two or all three Public Stratas.

And there are enough Agents, Managers and Promoters around to compete for those Grants, so gross „Abuse“ of them will be noticed.

Pro Helvetia, the Agency of the Swiss Federation once didn’t sponsor a Tour for a Rockband through the British Hinterlands claiming that the Band lacked Artistic “Eigenständigkeit” (Independence from Influences).

The Band appealed and Pro Helvetia was told that this was not enough of an Explanation to put down the Request.

So they were forced to revise their Decision.

They had the Nerve to deny the Money this Time for lack of „Originality“.

The Band didn’t want to get fooled this cheap Way and appealed again.

The Court didn’t like that move either and this Time told Pro Helvetia that they did not do their Job by just doubling down with the same Reason in other Words. So Pro Helvetia was ordered to finance the Tour according to the „Budget“.

Without the Public funding of Jazz in Europe Jazz would be reduced to Amateur Beauty Contests because the USA does never pay enough for Jazz.

So I say: Without Public Funding there‘d be no Jazz besides so Amateur Jazz.

Jazz needs Public Funding.

It just comes from somewhere else than the USA.

Expand full comment
32 more comments...

No posts